[address-policy-wg] 2007-02 New Policy Proposal (Change in IP Assignments for Anycasting DNS Policy)
- Previous message (by thread): Fwd: [address-policy-wg] 2007-02 New Policy Proposal (Change in IP Assignments for Anycasting DNS Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-02 New Policy Proposal (Change in IP Assignments for Anycasting DNS Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Andy Davidson
andy at nosignal.org
Wed May 9 17:39:02 CEST 2007
On 9 May 2007, at 14:54, Jeroen Massar wrote: > If you have 1 zone to serve, and you request a PI block for that, I > don't really see a real justification. What about if it's one very popular zone, and you want to get dns for it topologically close to as many end users as possible ? There's nothing to stop you breaking off a bit of your PA and getting that announced at lots of places where you host an anycast instance, but now we're causing deaggregation. -- Andy Davidson - ( http://www.andyd.net/ )
- Previous message (by thread): Fwd: [address-policy-wg] 2007-02 New Policy Proposal (Change in IP Assignments for Anycasting DNS Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-02 New Policy Proposal (Change in IP Assignments for Anycasting DNS Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]