Fwd: [address-policy-wg] 2007-02 New Policy Proposal (Change in IP Assignments for Anycasting DNS Policy)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-02 New Policy Proposal (Change in IP Assignments for Anycasting DNS Policy)
- Next message (by thread): Fwd: [address-policy-wg] 2007-02 New Policy Proposal (Change in IP Assignments for Anycasting DNS Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sebastian Wiesinger
sw+ripe-apwg at internetx.de
Thu May 10 09:50:04 CEST 2007
* Jeroen Massar <jeroen at unfix.org> [2007-05-09 15:55]: > If you have 1 zone to serve, and you request a PI block for that, I > don't really see a real justification. > > If you have one or more TLD's, I definitely see a justification. > > If you have 10.000 zones, I can also be tricked into seeing a justification. I agree with Jeroen. We're having waaay more than 10.000 zones which (currently) don't go over the 512 byte limit. On the contrary, if I wanted to get PI, what would stop me from taking one zone, expand it's dns records up to 512+ byte and request the space? I'm more in favor for a "number of zones" limit. Regards, Sebastian -- InterNetX GmbH Maximilianstr. 6 93047 Regensburg Germany Tel. +49 941 59559-480 Fax +49 941 59579-051 Geschäftsführer/CEO: Thomas Mörz Amtsgericht Regensburg, HRB 7142 nic-hdl : SW1421-RIPE GPG-Key : 0x97F5A1D8 (0x8431335F97F5A1D8) GPG-Fingerprint : 6181 B041 3554 0B6F 4EF3 1B12 8431 335F 97F5 A1D8
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-02 New Policy Proposal (Change in IP Assignments for Anycasting DNS Policy)
- Next message (by thread): Fwd: [address-policy-wg] 2007-02 New Policy Proposal (Change in IP Assignments for Anycasting DNS Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]