[address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Daniel Roesen
dr at cluenet.de
Wed Apr 6 11:55:31 CEST 2005
On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 11:35:11AM +0200, Gert Doering wrote: > Actually, as of today, IPv4 PI is much more convenient than the proposed > IPv6 policy: there is *no cost* attached to IPv4 PI. This isn't really correct. The sponsoring LIR pays for it, and usually will charge the customer for that one way or another. Some attach a price tag for it, others see it as added customer service. Best regards, Daniel -- CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr at cluenet.de -- dr at IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]