[address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Wed Apr 6 11:35:11 CEST 2005
Hi, On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 01:40:24AM +0300, Pekka Savola wrote: > On Tue, 5 Apr 2005, Daniel Roesen wrote: > >I guess you would agree with me that it's currently no problem at all > >to obtain an ASN and IPv4 PI if you want to multihome. Right? > > Umm. The proposed v6 policy seems weaker than that? AFAIR, you'll > have to justify half of the v4 address space.. and you don't even need > to do that to get a v6 block ? Actually, as of today, IPv4 PI is much more convenient than the proposed IPv6 policy: there is *no cost* attached to IPv4 PI. (And the need to justify the address space is obviously something that can be done - how hard is it for a not-so-small company to claim usage of 120 IPs? - and those they really don't have that many machines, just think something up, to get a "routeable" chunk) Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 71007 (66629) SpaceNet AG Mail: netmaster at Space.Net Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0 D- 80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-234
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]