[address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Wed Apr 6 14:19:52 CEST 2005
Hi, On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 11:55:31AM +0200, Daniel Roesen wrote: > On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 11:35:11AM +0200, Gert Doering wrote: > > Actually, as of today, IPv4 PI is much more convenient than the proposed > > IPv6 policy: there is *no cost* attached to IPv4 PI. > > This isn't really correct. The sponsoring LIR pays for it, and usually > will charge the customer for that one way or another. Some attach a > price tag for it, others see it as added customer service. Yes, you're right here. I remembered "PI is special" but forgot in which way (only charged in the first year, not in the following years, same as for AS numbers). Still different from "becoming a LIR and paying yearly recurring fees" (which the point I wanted to make). Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 71007 (66629) SpaceNet AG Mail: netmaster at Space.Net Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0 D- 80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-234
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]