[address-policy-wg] RIPE Access Policy Change Request to allow allocations to critical infrastructure
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RIPE Access Policy Change Request to allow allocations to critical infrastructure
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RIPE Access Policy Change Request to allow allocations to critical infrastructure
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Kurt Erik Lindqvist
kurtis at kurtis.pp.se
Wed Jan 7 19:49:49 CET 2004
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On onsdag, jan 7, 2004, at 17:32 Europe/Stockholm, Gert Doering wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 05:26:20PM +0100, Havard Eidnes wrote: >>> Conservation is not an issue regarding IPv6. >> >> ...within an address block, this is true. However, what is being >> talked about here is "globally routeable chunks of addresses", and >> there conservation *is* an issue, since nothing really changes with >> respect to routing with IPv6 compared to IPv4. > > I agree. > > I would be happy to sacrifice one routing table entry per ccTLD, > though, > if it increases reliability of the whole DNS system. Speaking for my > network only, of course. > > (This is not contradicting myself, I want to point out. The network of > the DENIC "office" is not special - but the name servers are. The > more, > the better, and there is no way to do anycasting without an additional > routing table entry). We solved this for IPv4 more or less with the PI-TF. Perhaps we should take this on as a point for IPv6. Agreed that it's not really the same problem, but partly the same methods could be used. - - kurtis - -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 8.0.3 iQA/AwUBP/xUz6arNKXTPFCVEQLOpACfQn/IkejCIeuGrFMOK/Bs7R5w8eMAmwai 4HIoOL8SU+9O40pbPTzVdlif =lzjl -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RIPE Access Policy Change Request to allow allocations to critical infrastructure
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RIPE Access Policy Change Request to allow allocations to critical infrastructure
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]