[address-policy-wg] RIPE Access Policy Change Request to allow allocations to critical infrastructure

On Wed, 7 Jan 2004, Pekka Savola wrote:

> On Wed, 7 Jan 2004, Gert Doering wrote:
> > I would be happy to sacrifice one routing table entry per ccTLD, though,
> > if it increases reliability of the whole DNS system.  Speaking for my
> > network only, of course.
>
> .. until someone figures out that, hey, each ccTLD actually requires
> more entries (e.g., 3), because having just one prefix for all the
> servers increases the danger/threat of a routing system hiccup for a
> prefix..

I see... However, 3 x (what? 200 countries) is still numerable... :)
However-bis im afraid the entries per ccTLD might tend more to 6 than 3...
even so i would prefer having 1200 "critical stuff" routes that some
thousands originated my misconfigurations/historical reasons...


> --
> Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
> Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
> Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
>


./Carlos
--------------                             IPv6 -> http://www.ip6.fccn.pt
            Wide Area Network Workgroup, CMF8-RIPE, CF596-ARIN
FCCN - Fundacao para a Computacao Cientifica Nacional  http://www.fccn.pt

 "Internet is just routes (131586/456), naming (millions) and... people!"