[address-policy-wg] RIPE Access Policy Change Request to allow allocations to critical infrastructure
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RIPE Access Policy Change Request to allow allocations to critical infrastructure
- Next message (by thread): Antwort: Re: [address-policy-wg] RIPE Access Policy Change Request to allow allocations to critical infrastructure
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Wed Jan 7 20:30:34 CET 2004
Hi, On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 06:01:00PM +0100, Jeroen Massar wrote: > > I would be happy to sacrifice one routing table entry per > > ccTLD, though, > > if it increases reliability of the whole DNS system. Speaking for my > > network only, of course. [..] > > Do you mean one (1) /32 that can be cut up into smaller > allocations (/48) which then should appear in the global > routing table, allowing the services that reside in those > blocks to be anycast? Or do you mean multiple /32's as the > case is for the moment*? For the routing table size, it doesn't really matter. Neither for the global address usage. For filtering reasons, /32s would be more convenient. (But we're not talking v6 yet :-) - DENIC aims at a v4 policy change) Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 57882 (57753) SpaceNet AG Mail: netmaster at Space.Net Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0 80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-299
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RIPE Access Policy Change Request to allow allocations to critical infrastructure
- Next message (by thread): Antwort: Re: [address-policy-wg] RIPE Access Policy Change Request to allow allocations to critical infrastructure
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]