<<< Chronological >>> Author Index    Subject Index <<< Threads >>>

Re: Meeting, Charging & Documents

  • To:
  • From: Eric Luyten < >
  • Date: Mon, 9 Sep 1996 12:59:47 +0200 (MET DST)
  • Reply-to:

[Mike Norris suggests]
> Compare the distribution of RIPE NCC contributors according to their 
> self-declared size with the distribution of IP address space allocated 
> to them; in other words, compare theory with reality.  
> If there's a mismatch, revise the theory.

Seconded. If new funding models are being introduced it makes little or
no sense to make the bulk of the bill depend on a self-declared size.

I would indeed expect that, model 3 (preferred) or 2 (minor shudder) being 
adopted, there is a single fixed cost component and not three.

Eric Luyten, BELNET.




  • Post To The List:
<<< Chronological >>> Author    Subject <<< Threads >>>