[routing-wg] RPKI validator 3: initial sync regression?
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] RPKI validator 3: initial sync regression?
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation) to be discussed on Anti-Abuse Working Group Mailing List
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Daniel Suchy
danny at danysek.cz
Fri Mar 22 16:47:45 CET 2019
Hello, we also observe problems on our installations with never versions. After very long period (hour+), all repositories loaded in 397. But after few hours of running, database file quickly grew up (13 GB total size, with more than 9 GB alocated within ~half hour). This problem was introduced somewhere between versions 386 and 397. Based on local observations, we returned to 377 for now. It seems, there're multiple regressions in new versions... - Daniel On 3/20/19 12:54 PM, Job Snijders wrote: > Hi all, > > I can confirm that 377 was the last release that was... usable. > > I tried 394 and yesterday's 397. Version 397 had only managed to load > RIPE + APNIC after 30 minutes, with no indication when the other > repositories would finish. > > Kind regards, > > Job > > On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 04:12:07PM +0100, Nathalie Trenaman wrote: >> Hi nusenu, >> >> We are looking into the situation with the validator as it seems to be >> problematic since release 378. Here are our findings so far: >> >> >> 1 Version Jar creation time Loading from scratch >> 2 ——————————————————————————————————— >> 3 >> 4 366 Jan 28, 11:47 5 minute’ish >> 5 370 Jan 28, 18:40 5 minute’ish >> 6 376 Jan 31, 14:15 5 minute’ish >> 7 377 Feb 01, 13:30 5 minute'ish >> 8 378 Mar 06, 14:23 Stuck after 10 mins, only pending APNIC >> 9 381 Mar 06, 18:30 Stuck after 10 mins, AFRINIC, LACNIC, APNIC done >> >> For now, I recommend to revert back to release 377 while we work on fixing the issue. Unfortunately, this build did not include the https fix for the RIS dumps. >> There is an issue in GitHub: https://github.com/RIPE-NCC/rpki-validator-3/issues/77 <https://github.com/RIPE-NCC/rpki-validator-3/issues/77> >> >> Regarding the git tags and/or change logs, you are right, we will include them in next releases. >> >> We’ll keep the mailinglist and GitHub posted. >> >> Thanks, >> Nathalie Trenaman >> RIPE NCC >> >>> Op 18 mrt. 2019, om 18:17 heeft nusenu <nusenu-lists at riseup.net> het volgende geschreven: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> lately with validator 3 version > 370 it felt like >>> rpki-validator 3 is less reliable and taking >>> longer to download RPKI repository data (especially RIPE's) >>> when starting for the first time when compared >>> to older version (313) where it probably took less than >>> 5 minutes after starting it to have the data for >>> all regions. I reproduced this consistently. >>> >>> Can you think of anything that caused this? >>> Does anyone else see this as well? >>> >>> Unfortunately I didn't find any changelogs >>> and it is not obvious what version relates to >>> what git commit since there are no git tags >>> in the github repo. >>> >>> It would be great to have changelogs or >>> git tags. >>> >>> thank you, >>> nusenu >>> >>> >>> -- >>> https://twitter.com/nusenu_ >>> https://mastodon.social/@nusenu >>> >>> >>> >> > > >
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] RPKI validator 3: initial sync regression?
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation) to be discussed on Anti-Abuse Working Group Mailing List
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]