[routing-wg] RPKI validator 3: initial sync regression?
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] RPKI validator 3: initial sync regression?
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] RPKI validator 3: initial sync regression?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jay Borkenhagen
jayb at braeburn.org
Wed Mar 20 13:03:54 CET 2019
FYI, as7018 has locked our rpki-validator-3 and rpki-rtr-server at their version 333. I had difficulty in my lab deployments moving beyond that version. In production, even that version 333 requires occasional manual restarts at unpredictable intervals to get rpki-validator-3 working again. Also, could RIPE resume displaying the version number on the validator's web pages? That had been the case for the version 2 validators. Thanks. Jay B. Job Snijders writes: > Hi all, > > I can confirm that 377 was the last release that was... usable. > > I tried 394 and yesterday's 397. Version 397 had only managed to load > RIPE + APNIC after 30 minutes, with no indication when the other > repositories would finish. > > Kind regards, > > Job > > On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 04:12:07PM +0100, Nathalie Trenaman wrote: > > Hi nusenu, > > > > We are looking into the situation with the validator as it seems to be > > problematic since release 378. Here are our findings so far: > > > > > > 1 Version Jar creation time Loading from scratch > > 2 ——————————————————————————————————— > > 3 > > 4 366 Jan 28, 11:47 5 minute’ish > > 5 370 Jan 28, 18:40 5 minute’ish > > 6 376 Jan 31, 14:15 5 minute’ish > > 7 377 Feb 01, 13:30 5 minute'ish > > 8 378 Mar 06, 14:23 Stuck after 10 mins, only pending APNIC > > 9 381 Mar 06, 18:30 Stuck after 10 mins, AFRINIC, LACNIC, APNIC done > > > > For now, I recommend to revert back to release 377 while we work on fixing the issue. Unfortunately, this build did not include the https fix for the RIS dumps. > > There is an issue in GitHub: https://github.com/RIPE-NCC/rpki-validator-3/issues/77 <https://github.com/RIPE-NCC/rpki-validator-3/issues/77> > > > > Regarding the git tags and/or change logs, you are right, we will include them in next releases. > > > > We’ll keep the mailinglist and GitHub posted. > > > > Thanks, > > Nathalie Trenaman > > RIPE NCC > > > > > Op 18 mrt. 2019, om 18:17 heeft nusenu <nusenu-lists at riseup.net> het volgende geschreven: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > lately with validator 3 version > 370 it felt like > > > rpki-validator 3 is less reliable and taking > > > longer to download RPKI repository data (especially RIPE's) > > > when starting for the first time when compared > > > to older version (313) where it probably took less than > > > 5 minutes after starting it to have the data for > > > all regions. I reproduced this consistently. > > > > > > Can you think of anything that caused this? > > > Does anyone else see this as well? > > > > > > Unfortunately I didn't find any changelogs > > > and it is not obvious what version relates to > > > what git commit since there are no git tags > > > in the github repo. > > > > > > It would be great to have changelogs or > > > git tags. > > > > > > thank you, > > > nusenu > > > > > > > > > -- > > > https://twitter.com/nusenu_ > > > https://mastodon.social/@nusenu > > > > > > > > > > > > >
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] RPKI validator 3: initial sync regression?
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] RPKI validator 3: initial sync regression?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]