You are here: Home > Participate > Join a Discussion > Mailman Archives
<<< Chronological >>> Author Index    Subject Index <<< Threads >>>

Re: Open letter

  • To: Peter Lothberg < >
  • From: Jon Crowcroft < >
  • Date: Wed, 23 Sep 92 07:27:41 +0100
  • Cc:

 >> The whole issue is of course to maintain reasonalbe full control of
 >> routing and mangement so that any migration to IPv7, CIDER TUBA etc
 >> MAY be possible.
 >IPv7 is CLNP on the 'internetworking' layer, no magic, and it still
 >have some of the old source/dest limitation's, even thus it might do
 >some good. (Personally I think we need another kind of toy here)

IPv7 may be CLNP or PIP or IPAE or is NOT decided til at
earliest next ietf...

 >There is somthing more, routing of troble-tickets, with todays
 >international cooperation among all the actors (maybe not EMPB) we can
 >receive a user complain't and get it resolved , even if it crosses
 >*MANY* operators/networks.

agree definitely!!!


  • Post To The List:
<<< Chronological >>> Author    Subject <<< Threads >>>