This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ripe-list@ripe.net/
[ripe-list] RIPE Working Group Chair Collective Meeting Summary
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-list] RIPE Working Group Chair Collective Meeting Summary
 - Next message (by thread): [ripe-list] RIPE Working Group Chair Collective Meeting Summary
 
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Tue Feb  9 13:16:44 CET 2021
hi,
On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 12:33:18PM +0100, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via ripe-list wrote:
> 2) Not always we have "problem" (point 4, 1st p.) and thus it means a problem statement can be acceptable for some folks and not others, so clearly this must not be in the hands of a few (like WG chairs), but part of the consensus. For example, sometimes (2018-04 is a good example of that), we are adopting policy changes, or even PDP changes, because there is a need to improve the clarify of the text and avoid different interpretations, which can be a very bad thing.
"there is a need to improve" is a very clear problem statement :-)
A problem *statement* does not have to be "LIRs are starving!", but it
defines whatever it is that is to be addressed by a policy proposal.
For policy proposals to progress in a meaningful way, there needs to be
some sort of common understanding on the "problem statement" aka "what is
it that we are going to improve here, and why?" *before* a full-blown
new policy text falls from the sky.
If this is missing, usually people do not react in the most open and
welcoming way to "hey, I have a new wall of text here!" ambush proposals.
(A problem statement does not have to be "we're going to improve the
world" class - it can be just "I, speaking for my LIR, have seen problems
with <this>, and I think it can be improved by doing <that>" - which is
a very clear statement on *why* things are proposed.  Then the community
can start discussing the *how* - but "why?" needs to come first)
Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/ripe-list/attachments/20210209/3c4a2157/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-list] RIPE Working Group Chair Collective Meeting Summary
 - Next message (by thread): [ripe-list] RIPE Working Group Chair Collective Meeting Summary
 
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]