[atlas] bounces?

On 2013.04.12. 23:22, Sulev-Madis Silber wrote:
> On 2013-04-12 12:51, Robert Kisteleki wrote:
>> In the future we plan to switch to measuring the probe "uptime" (or "useful
>> time") based on the regular measurements it does, rather than pure
>> connection times.
> 
> 
> I would also like to still see full path end-to-end uptime somewhere.
> Indeed, it's really questionable where the "end" is. Of course it might
> desirable to determine the uptime of "weaker end", in case when this is
> home installation, which can be physically and electrically unstable.

Most of our users seem to be interested more in the measurements results
than in continuous end-to-end connections. But we can of course keep this
information available. In fact we also planned to extend it with the reason
for disconnects, when we know it (such as probe reboots).

> P.S: I had to say this, for name "Robert Kisteleki" in this mail my
> Thunderbird spell check suggests "Robert Telekinesis". I hope this
> wasn't bad personal joke...

:-)

Regards,
Robert