Sulev-Madis Silber madis555 at hot.ee
Fri Apr 12 23:22:47 CEST 2013
On 2013-04-12 12:51, Robert Kisteleki wrote: > In the future we plan to switch to measuring the probe "uptime" (or "useful > time") based on the regular measurements it does, rather than pure > connection times. I would also like to still see full path end-to-end uptime somewhere. Indeed, it's really questionable where the "end" is. Of course it might desirable to determine the uptime of "weaker end", in case when this is home installation, which can be physically and electrically unstable. I'm moving towards more stable home network here, with my >30min UPS / overvoltage protection. As for stats, this probe hosting location is private house in small town Saue, Estonia (I consider sending "probe action photo" to be included in that really good selection of existing ones), powered via insulated low voltage overhead mains cable and connected to internet via copper pair on where ADSL2+ runs to local ISP PoP. Ehm, now I'm going too far from original reason I wrote this message here... That should be up there somewhere. P.S: I had to say this, for name "Robert Kisteleki" in this mail my Thunderbird spell check suggests "Robert Telekinesis". I hope this wasn't bad personal joke...