[RIPE Atlas Ambassadors] Fwd: Re: Deploying RIPE Atlas probes in more locations and networks

-------- Forwarded Message --------
From: 21 2015 <>
X-Mozilla-Status: 0001
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00800000
X-Mozilla-Keys:
Subject: Re: [RIPE Atlas Ambassadors] Deploying RIPE Atlas probes in
more locations and networks
To: dp at datasoftcomnet.com
References: <lxatxl6n4u6ud94e7wf2eyk6.1440476198121 at email.android.com>
From: Daniel Karrenberg <daniel.karrenberg at ripe.net>
X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110
Message-ID: <55DC1E78.8070503 at ripe.net>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 09:51:20 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0)
Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <lxatxl6n4u6ud94e7wf2eyk6.1440476198121 at email.android.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

My elevator pitch:

Of course you have your network monitored and running well. ;-)
Your customer experience however is based on the *Inter*net: They want
to communicate with customers of other networks. So how is your
connectivity with other networks at any point in time? RIPE Atlas
provides thousands of vantage points around the Internet to look at your
network and measure how well your customers are reachable from the rest
of the Internet. You can set up both continuous monitoring and look at
specific issues in real time. You can integrate the continuous external
monitoring with your internal monitoring system. The very reasonable
price is installing a few probes. If you are happy with what you get,
install an anchor.

Daniel

On 25.08.15 6:18 , dp at datasoftcomnet.com wrote:
> Hello all, 
> Can someone share an elevator pitch on why an ISP or an organisation
> that is on 24/7 needs to put a probe in their  network. 
> What are the benefits they would get? 
> Has someone prepared a case study. 
> 
> Regards DP 
> 9849111010. 
> 
> Sent from my phone. Please excuse brevity and typos if any. 
> 
> 
> -------- Original message --------
> From: Emile Aben <emile.aben at ripe.net>
> Date: 25/08/2015 09:25 (GMT+05:30)
> To: Sebastian Castro <sebastian at nzrs.net.nz>
> Cc: ripe-atlas-ambassadors at ripe.net
> Subject: Re: [RIPE Atlas Ambassadors] Deploying RIPE Atlas probes in
> more locations and networks
> 
> On 24/08/15 23:53, Sebastian Castro wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 24/08/15 11:27 pm, Vesna Manojlovic wrote:
>>> Dear ambassadors,
>>
>> Hi Vesna:
>>
>>>
>>> You’ve helped us do a great job in distributing RIPE Atlas probes to
>>> many networks and regions of the world, but we still have work to do!
>>> There are a few ways to find out exactly where we need your help:
>>>
>>> 1) Networks with the most users and fewest probes
>>>
>>> In order to increase topological diversity, it would be good to "target"
>>> the users of the networks that don’t have a lot - or any - coverage.
>>>
>>> This RIPE Labs article lists the top 20 ASNs:
>>>
> https://labs.ripe.net/Members/emileaben/improving-ripe-atlas-coverage-what-networks-are-missing
>>>
>>>
>>> Or you can see the raw-text table here, sorted by the network size:
>>> http://sg-pub.ripe.net/emile/atlas_eyeball_coverage.txt
>>>
>>
>> Emile's work is really valuable and much appreciated. Is it possible to
>> have a date of generation on that file? It seems to be the same as few
>> months ago, considering we have deployed probes in the last two months
>> that increase coverage.
> 
> This was a one-off, timestamp on the file says I did that on 26 June.
> I've just put a new one here:
> http://sg-pub.ripe.net/emile/atlas-coverage/
> 
>>> 2) Comparing population density with the distribution of RIPE Atlas
> probes
>>>
>>> Emile Aben used CartoDB to plot, population and probe density on the
>>> same map:
>>>
> https://emileaben.cartodb.com/viz/3caa5144-823e-11e4-8025-0e018d66dc29/public_map
>>>
>>>
>>> https://labs.ripe.net/Members/emileaben/distribution-of-ripe-atlas-probes
>>>
>>> 3) Comparing coverage between countries
>>>
>>> This map shows the percentage of probes per country:
>>> https://atlas.ripe.net/results/maps/density/
>>>
>>> Whichever method you choose, we trust your instincts and your knowledge
>>> of the local community to make the right decision and give probes to the
>>> best people!
>>
>> We have a different method, that uses address space to determine which
>> ASNs are relevant to cover.
>>
>> The eyeball method works for ISP that serve customers, but not for those
>> that provide transit. Our methodology, that picks a BGP table dump and
>> calculates the ratio of /24 versus number of probes helps us to have
>> more coverage and to quickly identify targets.
> 
> Heh. We had a discussion last week in the office which boiled down to
> pretty much what you describe here, as an alternative to 'eyeball' data.
> I expect more in this space soon :)
> 
> Cheers and many thanks to all our ambassadors for the great work they
> are doing!
> Emile
> 
> _______________________________________________
> RIPE-Atlas-Ambassadors mailing list
> RIPE-Atlas-Ambassadors at ripe.net
> https://www.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/ripe-atlas-ambassadors
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> RIPE-Atlas-Ambassadors mailing list
> RIPE-Atlas-Ambassadors at ripe.net
> https://www.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/ripe-atlas-ambassadors
>