[ncc-services-wg] 2012-07 Discussion Period extended until 21 February 2013 (RIPE NCC Service to Legacy Internet Resource Holders)
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-07 Discussion Period extended until 21 February 2013 (RIPE NCC Service to Legacy Internet Resource Holders)
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-07 Discussion Period extended until 21 February 2013 (RIPE NCC Service to Legacy Internet Resource Holders)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Philipp Kern
philipp.kern at kit.edu
Thu Feb 7 10:45:40 CET 2013
Randy, am Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 06:01:25PM -0800 hast du folgendes geschrieben: > i would suggest that there is a non-trivial number of lrhs who would be > happy to form a more formal bond with the ncc to ensure their data are > correct, and quite willing to pay a modest fee for the services > currently provided for free. they just don't want to come under address > policies and rights reduction of ncc membership. I think the biggest fear that we have when registering our legacy resources with RIPE is, that the billing scheme might change considerably, counting our legacy assignments in full. We're a LIR already, too. But that's what Sascha called the "trap", I guess. On the other hand I think many people agree that address policies do not apply to legacy resources. Putting this into a policy makes sense to me, even though I'm aware that future generations of policy makers might change it again. ;-) Kind regards Philipp Kern
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-07 Discussion Period extended until 21 February 2013 (RIPE NCC Service to Legacy Internet Resource Holders)
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-07 Discussion Period extended until 21 February 2013 (RIPE NCC Service to Legacy Internet Resource Holders)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]