[ncc-services-wg] 2012-07 Discussion Period extended until 21 February 2013 (RIPE NCC Service to Legacy Internet Resource Holders)
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-07 Discussion Period extended until 21 February 2013 (RIPE NCC Service to Legacy Internet Resource Holders)
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-07 Discussion Period extended until 21 February 2013 (RIPE NCC Service to Legacy Internet Resource Holders)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Niall O'Reilly
niall.oreilly at ucd.ie
Tue Feb 5 16:46:36 CET 2013
On 5 Feb 2013, at 15:16, Nick Hilliard wrote: > fwiw, i found this quite ambiguous too. It took several careful scans over > the doc to figure out the intention. Some wordsmithing here would be quite > beneficial. Version 1 attracted criticism for (among other things!) mixing policy and motivation. I took the message that the policy itself should be as bare as possible, and that the motivation belonged in the discussion on this list. I brought this message to the process of drafting version 2, and pushed the "less is more" notion to the other co-authors. If I've taken this idea further than necessary, I'm sorry. /Niall
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-07 Discussion Period extended until 21 February 2013 (RIPE NCC Service to Legacy Internet Resource Holders)
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-07 Discussion Period extended until 21 February 2013 (RIPE NCC Service to Legacy Internet Resource Holders)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]