[ncc-services-wg] 2012-07 Discussion Period extended until 21 February 2013 (RIPE NCC Service to Legacy Internet Resource Holders)
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-07 Discussion Period extended until 21 February 2013 (RIPE NCC Service to Legacy Internet Resource Holders)
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-07 Discussion Period extended until 21 February 2013 (RIPE NCC Service to Legacy Internet Resource Holders)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Niall O'Reilly
niall.oreilly at ucd.ie
Tue Feb 5 16:24:22 CET 2013
On 5 Feb 2013, at 14:30, Randy Bush wrote: > that was not the intent > > the sentence of 2.6 you quote would seem to refer to services NOW being > provided to lrhs, which do not include certification. +1 This is intended to ensure operational continuity per service/resource pair, not to create back-door access either to new services or to current services not already provided for a specific resource. An informal summary of the subsections in section 2 might read 2.1 .. 2.3: business as usual; 2.4: new business process for when "usual" doesn't fit a specific case; 2.5: exceptional accommodation for hard cases; 2.6: do no harm. > but any tweaks to wording to make things clearer greatly appreciated, i > am sure. Absolutely, and especially from anyone who sees a divergence between what is in the proposal and what I've offered as a summary above. /Niall
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-07 Discussion Period extended until 21 February 2013 (RIPE NCC Service to Legacy Internet Resource Holders)
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-07 Discussion Period extended until 21 February 2013 (RIPE NCC Service to Legacy Internet Resource Holders)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]