[ncc-services-wg] Policy proposal for services to legacy Internet resource holders
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Policy proposal for services to legacy Internet resource holders
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Policy proposal for services to legacy Internet resource holders
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nigel Titley
nigel at titley.com
Wed Aug 29 13:47:20 CEST 2012
On 29/08/2012 12:12, Randy Bush wrote: > the pdp may have no current juristiction. but what is attempting to be > negotiated is for the pdp to have juristiction. do you have a > suggestion for a different approach/venue? Now this is starting to make sense. In which case I think we need to have a little reworking of the proposal. >> Please understand this is a somewhat mischievious question, but one that >> I feel needs to be answered. > all taken in good humor and assuming good intent. we have a wonderful > opportunity to take the high ground here, maintain humor, assume the > best of intent, and set a civilized example. Yes, and I'd like us to succeed. I think everyone here owes a great debt to the legacy holders (and bear in mind that I was one). Without their work we'd be wallowing in an OSI mess built on top of X25. > > randy, pgp signing because some will not believe i wrote that :) I can't think why :-) Nigel
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Policy proposal for services to legacy Internet resource holders
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Policy proposal for services to legacy Internet resource holders
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]