[ncc-services-wg] Policy proposal for services to legacy Internet resource holders
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Policy proposal for services to legacy Internet resource holders
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Policy proposal for services to legacy Internet resource holders
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Carsten Schiefner
ripe-wgs.cs at schiefner.de
Wed Aug 29 12:18:36 CEST 2012
Hi Nigel, On 29.08.2012 12:08, Nigel Titley wrote: > This actually raises an interesting issue. Are there any circumstances > in which RIPE policy would apply to legacy space? Could, for example, > the AP-WG unilaterally propose a policy that annexed legacy space? I've > heard this suggested several times. And of course, if RIPE policy > doesn't apply to legacy space, why are the legacy holders raising a > proposal at all? maybe it should be looked at the other way round: that legacy space holders as good netizens want to unilaterally move this address space under a policy, given that the policy serves their needs and views? Best, Carsten
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Policy proposal for services to legacy Internet resource holders
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Policy proposal for services to legacy Internet resource holders
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]