[ncc-services-wg] RIPE tasks

• Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] RIPE tasks
• Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] RIPE tasks

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Neil J. McRae neil at COLT.NET
Wed Aug 13 15:46:12 CEST 2003

> This is something I would agree on.  Break down the 
> functions, ask the members, and then do what the majority wants.
> 
> Of course this doesn't mean that everybody is happy with the 
> result :-)
> 

Some might say this is the situation we are in now. Frankly, I think
the core part of the RIPE NCC should be something thats set in stone as 
much as it can be, with the other activities have a process to
start and finish them that needs to have a reasonably majority of
the membership in favour to approve, proposals should have
an indication of the budget and how it is expected to be
funded, with clear end deliverables and timescales. 

Regards,
Neil. 

• Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] RIPE tasks
• Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] RIPE tasks

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ ncc-services-wg Archives ]