[ncc-services-wg] RIPE tasks
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] RIPE tasks
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] RIPE tasks
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hank Nussbacher
hank at att.net.il
Wed Aug 13 16:39:47 CEST 2003
At 03:36 PM 13-08-03 +0200, Gert Doering wrote: >Hi, > >On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 04:14:23PM +0200, Hank Nussbacher wrote: > > that being said, i may be a minority voice among ripe ncc membership on > > this issue. what i am asking for is that ripe ncc break down all their > > functions - and "ask/poll" its paying membership which to continue and > > which not to pursue. example: if the majority are in favor of funding > ripe > > ncc training, i will have no problem with it. i will even become an > > advocate for it. > >This is something I would agree on. Break down the functions, ask the >members, and then do what the majority wants. > >Of course this doesn't mean that everybody is happy with the result :-) neither will i. thats what makes it good. -hank >Gert Doering > -- NetMaster >-- >Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 56535 (56318) > >SpaceNet AG Mail: netmaster at Space.Net >Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0 >80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-299
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] RIPE tasks
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] RIPE tasks
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]