[ncc-services-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: ICANN vs RIPE NCC, was Re: Summary of the PI ......

On Wed, 13 Aug 2003, Hank Nussbacher wrote:

> At 08:37 AM 13-08-03 +0100, Carlos Friacas wrote:
>
> >I dont know if im right, but i figure, that the main idea for everybody to
> >pay for the training is getting everybody trained -- as it is included.
> >I only see one aspect/situation against it: a trained LIR person exchanges
> >jobs, going into a company that will manage a new LIR. In this case should
> >this LIR pay for the training of its already-trained human resource? Or it
> >is paying for the training that person got some time ago?
> >
>
> when i go to an MS course or a Cisco course, I do not expect your company
> to partially fund my attendence.  I fail to see how a newly trained LIR
> benefits me - anymore so than a newly trained CCIE in some place 1000km
> away might benefit me.
>
> -Hank

That is pretty much my doubt... it is assumed that each LIR only pays for
the training of *its own* staff??? -- i expect to read a YES soon.

If a LIR has *one* person during 5 years doing RIPE work, it is expected
that this person will attend trainings every year? -- as a recycling
process?

Shouldnt one LIR get a free registration to a meeting if anybody
goes to training during a certain period? -- free registrations are
provided to new LIRs, if im not mistaken...

Regards,

./Carlos                                  "Upgrade the Internet! -- Now!"
--------------         [http://www.ip6.fccn.pt]        http://www.fccn.pt
<cfriacas at fccn.pt>, CMF8-RIPE, CF596-ARIN, Wide Area Network Workgroup
FCCN - Fundacao para a Computacao Cientifica Nacional  fax:+351 218472167

 "Internet is just routes (125953/461), naming (millions) and... people!"