[ncc-services-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: ICANN vs RIPE NCC, was Re: Summary of the PI ......
Hank Nussbacher hank at att.net.il
Wed Aug 13 10:56:26 CEST 2003
At 08:37 AM 13-08-03 +0100, Carlos Friacas wrote: >I dont know if im right, but i figure, that the main idea for everybody to >pay for the training is getting everybody trained -- as it is included. >I only see one aspect/situation against it: a trained LIR person exchanges >jobs, going into a company that will manage a new LIR. In this case should >this LIR pay for the training of its already-trained human resource? Or it >is paying for the training that person got some time ago? > when i go to an MS course or a Cisco course, I do not expect your company to partially fund my attendence. I fail to see how a newly trained LIR benefits me - anymore so than a newly trained CCIE in some place 1000km away might benefit me. -Hank > > > Peter > > > > > > > Hank Nussbacher > >Regards, > >./Carlos "Upgrade the Internet! -- Now!" >-------------- [http://www.ip6.fccn.pt] http://www.fccn.pt ><cfriacas at fccn.pt>, CMF8-RIPE, CF596-ARIN, Wide Area Network Workgroup >FCCN - Fundacao para a Computacao Cientifica Nacional fax:+351 218472167 > > "Internet is just routes (125953/461), naming (millions) and... people!"