[ncc-services-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: ICANN vs RIPE NCC, was Re: Summary of the PI ......

At 08:37 AM 13-08-03 +0100, Carlos Friacas wrote:

>I dont know if im right, but i figure, that the main idea for everybody to
>pay for the training is getting everybody trained -- as it is included.
>I only see one aspect/situation against it: a trained LIR person exchanges
>jobs, going into a company that will manage a new LIR. In this case should
>this LIR pay for the training of its already-trained human resource? Or it
>is paying for the training that person got some time ago?
>

when i go to an MS course or a Cisco course, I do not expect your company 
to partially fund my attendence.  I fail to see how a newly trained LIR 
benefits me - anymore so than a newly trained CCIE in some place 1000km 
away might benefit me.

-Hank


> > > Peter
> > >
> >
> > Hank Nussbacher
>
>Regards,
>
>./Carlos                                  "Upgrade the Internet! -- Now!"
>--------------         [http://www.ip6.fccn.pt]        http://www.fccn.pt
><cfriacas at fccn.pt>, CMF8-RIPE, CF596-ARIN, Wide Area Network Workgroup
>FCCN - Fundacao para a Computacao Cientifica Nacional  fax:+351 218472167
>
>  "Internet is just routes (125953/461), naming (millions) and... people!"