[members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Publication of Draft Charging Scheme Models 2024

hi will,

> Maybe counting per IP rather than subnet size would be an option for a
> better granularity, a " simple formula " might do the trick. But a much
> higher top end is absolutely a need.
> 
>>> I would like to support that comment from Clement, it seems to me that
>>> huge players will not get impacted much by this charging plans. As I
>>> see it, some small ISPs (let's say with a /19) will get charged a 4th
>>> of what an incumbent (3215,3320,3303) would pay for their IPs, as the
>>> cap is a /15.
>> 
>> would finer granularity in the step function, and a much higher top end
>> address this issue sufficiently?

how about something nerdy such as €X per /24 and €Y per /48 ?

randy