[members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Publication of Draft Charging Scheme Models 2024

Randy,

Maybe counting per IP rather than subnet size would be an option for a
better granularity, a " simple formula " might do the trick. But a much
higher top end is absolutely a need.

Will

On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 09:38:30AM -0700, Randy Bush wrote:
>will,
>
>> I would like to support that comment from Clement, it seems to me that
>> huge players will not get impacted much by this charging plans. As I
>> see it, some small ISPs (let's say with a /19) will get charged a 4th
>> of what an incumbent (3215,3320,3303) would pay for their IPs, as the
>> cap is a /15.
>
>would finer granularity in the step function, and a much higher top end
>address this issue sufficiently?
>
>randy