[members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Publication of Draft Charging Scheme Models 2024

Hello,

As far as i understand there is also option number 4 (if you decide not to
choose any of A/B/C), which will kep everything like it is now.
But somehow it is not widely discussed and might be not obvious to members.

Andrey


> Hello,
>
> It's great to see that member feedback has been taken into account when
> developing these models. However, I would like to reiterate my concerns
> regarding Model C and propose that it should be excluded from the final
> selection.
>
> In summary, Model C introduces transfer fees, which, as I mentioned
> earlier, bring potential challenges, such as unpredictability in the
> RIPE NCC's annual budget, payment difficulties for sanctioned countries,
> increased administrative burdens, complexities related to PI blocks and
> ASNs transfers, etc. These factors could negatively affect the RIPE NCC
> and its members.
>
> Considering the potential issues with Model C, I suggest that focusing
> on Models A and B would be a more reasonable approach. Both models
> provide sufficient options for the members and maintain their respective
> merits without the risks associated with Model C.
>
> By excluding Model C from the final proposals, the voting process will
> be more focused, enabling members to make a well-informed decision
> between the two remaining models. This strategy would prevent Model C
> from diluting the decision-making process and ensure the adoption of a
> more suitable and sustainable charging scheme.
>
> Furthermore, Model B represents a familiar charging scheme for the
> members, ensuring stability and continuity. In contrast, Model A offers
> an alternative, category-based system catering to the diverse needs of
> the membership base, promoting fairness and adaptability within the RIPE
> NCC community.
>
> Model C, on the other hand, only adds uncertainty by introducing
> transfer fees, which could negatively affect the RIPE NCC's financial
> stability. As this model doesn't provide any significant benefits over
> Models A and B, it would be more advantageous to concentrate on refining
> Models A and B, ensuring a well-balanced charging scheme for the RIPE
> NCC community.
>
> Regards,
> Victor
>
>
>> Dear RIPE NCC members,
>>
>> I want to thank all those who contributed to the consultation so far on
>> the RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2024 and the model we should use for the
>> coming years.
>>
>> We can now share three draft models that we developed based on input
>> from the members on the Members Discuss mailing list and in the Charging
>> Scheme Open House, as well as from the discussions at the recent
>> Executive Board Meeting.
>>
>> The result is that we are proposing three draft charging scheme models:
>> one category-based and two that are based on the previous "one LIR
>> account, one fee" model. We hope to receive feedback on these models by
>> 19 April so the Executive Board can propose the final versions on 26
>> April. The members will then vote on those three models at the upcoming
>> General Meeting on 24-26 May.
>>
>> The three models all aim to fulfil a budget that is roughly the same as
>> 2023 plus general cost increases including inflation, so EUR 42-45
>> million. By doing this, we can ensure that we can meet the potential
>> budgetary requirements for 2024 while retaining the option for members
>> to redistribute any excess contributions should we receive excess funds.
>> The Activity Plan and Budget will be discussed with members this coming
>> Autumn.
>>
>> The three models are available to review at:
>> https://www.ripe.net/participate/mail/member-and-community-consultations/charging-scheme-2024-consultation
>>
>> We also provide an updated calculator where members can see for
>> themselves how much they might pay under the draft models:
>> https://www.ripe.net/participate/mail/member-and-community-consultations/new-calculator-charging-scheme-2024.xlsx
>>
>> To summarise the main features of the three models:
>>
>> Model A - Category Model
>>
>> This model has ten categories to provide greater granularity. It also
>> charges separately for independent and legacy resources in exactly the
>> same way as in previous years. Additionally, a separate 50 EUR ASN
>> assignment fee has been added. Both separately charged resources do not
>> contribute to the category scores. This means there is no double
>> charging and no specific charging for transfers or administrative work
>> carried out by the RIPE NCC. There is a New /24 IPv4 administration fee
>> to ensure there is a financial consequence to joining the IPv4 Waiting
>> List. The fee would be payable upon receipt of the /24, and members
>> joining the waiting list who do not have an eligible LIR account, would
>> pay the new LIR sign-up fee to open a new LIR account and join the
>> waiting list.
>>
>> With this model, approximately 68% of members would pay less than the
>> current annual fee, with the remaining 32% paying more.
>>
>> The discussion with members helped us to see that a category-based model
>> would receive significant support from members if the version was
>> simplified. Should members see the need to charge for other elements,
>> then that can be incorporated into the category model in the coming
>> years. Any such additional charges could potentially then reduce the
>> fees per category.
>>
>> Model B - Price increase and ASN fee
>>
>> This model is the exact same as in the previous ten years, but there is
>> a price increase of EUR 150 and a 50 EUR ASN fee to ensure we can meet
>> our budgetary requirements while retaining the option for members to
>> redistribute any excess contribution should we receive excess funds.
>>
>> Model C - Transfer fee and ASN fee
>>
>> This model is the exact same as in the previous ten years, but there is
>> a charge of EUR 1,000 per transfer to be paid by the receiving party and
>> a 50 EUR ASN fee to ensure we can meet our budgetary requirements while
>> retaining the option for members to redistribute any excess contribution
>> should we receive excess funds.
>>
>> Further information on the charging scheme models is provided at:
>> https://www.ripe.net/participate/mail/member-and-community-consultations/charging-scheme-2024-consultation/
>>
>> The RIPE NCC Executive Board believes that a category-based model is the
>> best option to help address uncertainty that might be caused by
>> consolidation with multiple LIRs and to provide greater flexibility and
>> fairness in how we charge members in the coming years.
>>
>> On 26 April, the final versions of the charging schemes that members
>> will vote on will be published for the members to consider and discuss.
>> If you have comments on the draft charging schemes, we therefore ask you
>> to comment on the members-discuss mailing list by 19 April so we have
>> time to incorporate any feedback if necessary.
>>
>> Importantly, we ask all members to register for the RIPE NCC General
>> Meeting where the final decision will be in your hands. Register to
>> participate and vote at:
>> https://my.ripe.net/#/meetings/active
>>
>> Simon-Jan Haytink
>> Chief Financial Officer
>> RIPE NCC
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> members-discuss mailing list
> members-discuss at ripe.net
> https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss
> Unsubscribe:
> https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/andrejs.guba%40lvnet.lv
>