This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[members-discuss] Charging Scheme Models 2024
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Charging Scheme Models 2024
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Charging Scheme Models 2024
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Fearghas Mckay
fearghas at gmail.com
Fri Apr 14 17:20:21 CEST 2023
Brandon et al > On Apr 13, 2023, at 12:06, Brandon Butterworth <hostmaster at bogons.net> wrote: > > I think the best option is to use current model, which is least worst > as we've all been paying it for some years, apply RPI increase, then > let RIPE determine how to live within it. Then we don't have all try > and determine a viable business model for something we don't really > know much detail of. I would second that as a proposal. Perhaps fewer business class flights to NCC events to use up the travel budget would help towards balancing the books going forward. Thanks f
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Charging Scheme Models 2024
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Charging Scheme Models 2024
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]