[members-discuss] Administrative procedures within RIPE NCC: Any way to soften it ?
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Administrative procedures within RIPE NCC: Any way to soften it ?
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Administrative procedures within RIPE NCC: Any way to soften it ?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Wed Jul 8 20:11:24 CEST 2020
Hi, On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 09:06:06PM +0300, Aleksey Bulgakov wrote: > LIR's don't have influence, because there are some people who decide are > there enough money for bloated budget, is it time to implement any > restrictions and which voice is good and which one should not be accepted. This statement is blatantly wrong, and you are aware of that. If the NCC management / board are indeed not listening to you, you can (as a member) put it as a voting item on the next AGM agenda. Now, if most of your LIR colleagues disagree with you, that's the problem with voting. Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20200708/3cccba88/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Administrative procedures within RIPE NCC: Any way to soften it ?
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Administrative procedures within RIPE NCC: Any way to soften it ?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]