[members-discuss] Administrative procedures within RIPE NCC: Any way to soften it ?

Hi.

LIR's don't have influence, because there are some people who decide are
there enough money for bloated budget, is it time to implement any
restrictions and which voice is good and which one  should not be accepted.


ср, 8 июл. 2020 г., 20:55 Gert Doering <gert at space.net>:

> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 07:49:02PM +0300, Max Tulyev wrote:
> > I think the root of the problem is RIPE is not enough involved in RIPE
> > NCC internal processes. We (as RIPE) should have more influence in RIPE
> > NCC procedures and it's development. Please support me anyone if I'm
> right.
>
> Paying members of the NCC, aka LIRs, have maximum influence via the
> AGM (though it might take a while, and if you have no majorities, stuff
> does not happen).
>
> Besides that, ncc-services *does* work to get NCC irks changed.
>
> Gert Doering
>         -- NetMaster
> --
> have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
>
> SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael
> Emmer
> Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
> D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
> Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
> _______________________________________________
> members-discuss mailing list
> members-discuss at ripe.net
> https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss
> Unsubscribe:
> https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/aleksbulgakov%40gmail.com
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20200708/d3c352a7/attachment.html>