[members-discuss] BLACK FRIDAY IPv4 transfer

Hi!

Am 03.12.19 um 13:34 schrieb Daniel Pearson:
> It's a novel idea but it won't help much.
>
> Three years ago now Apple required all applications within its store 
> to run on IPv6. Do you know what the solution was for the vast 
> majority of those app developers?
>
> Toss CloudFlare or another CDN in-front of their IPv4 only stack to 
> give it IPv6 without addressing the underlying service or stack.
>
> If Google now ranks based on IPv6, that's all anyone will do, is toss 
> CloudFlare infront of the site.
>
The content will at least be reachable via IPv6. At the moment we have a 
chicken and egg problem. The access is not deploying IPv6 as there is no 
content and the content is not deploying it, as no one will access it 
via v6. Things could be start rolling and then there should be some 
incentives to get the access providers to use more IPv6 (cheaper traffic 
/ exclusive IPv6 content).

Matthias

> On 12/3/19 4:44 AM, Jan Zorz - Go6 wrote:
>> On 03/12/2019 11:29, Brandon Butterworth wrote:
>>> On Tue Dec 03, 2019 at 11:17:04AM +0200, ivaylo wrote:
>>>> The idea is very good ! As all google services are fully dual stack
>>>> already and running perfectly on IPV6, I dont think will be technical
>>>> unimposible.
>>>>
>>>> The only problem is how can we make google do this?
>>>
>>> It's been suggested to them many times at over the years
>>> (probably started with v6 day) but it's failed to get attention.
>>>
>>> May be we've never run into the right people to tell, other than
>>> telling any googler you meet maybe it needs to find a way higher up.
>>> Publicity, social?
>>
>> Similar proposal was done for the first time (I think) back in 2010 
>> (by Sander and myself), but what we got back from Google repeatedly 
>> over all this years (several times) was more or less excuses why they 
>> can't do it...
>>
>> https://go6.si/2010/08/suggestion-for-internet-search-engines-proposed-ipv6-impact-on-search-engine-scoring-algorithms/ 
>>
>>
>> Maybe if we collectively suggest it again they would look at it 
>> again. I heard that they'll take "speed of loading" into account, 
>> they already implemented it for http/https scoring, so I really can't 
>> see why offering content over IPv6 could not improve the ranking...
>>
>> Cheers, Jan Žorž
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> members-discuss mailing list
>> members-discuss at ripe.net
>> https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss
>> Unsubscribe: 
>> https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/daniel%40privatesystems.net
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> members-discuss mailing list
> members-discuss at ripe.net
> https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss
>