[members-discuss] BLACK FRIDAY IPv4 transfer

It's a novel idea but it won't help much.

Three years ago now Apple required all applications within its store to 
run on IPv6. Do you know what the solution was for the vast majority of 
those app developers?

Toss CloudFlare or another CDN in-front of their IPv4 only stack to give 
it IPv6 without addressing the underlying service or stack.

If Google now ranks based on IPv6, that's all anyone will do, is toss 
CloudFlare infront of the site.

On 12/3/19 4:44 AM, Jan Zorz - Go6 wrote:
> On 03/12/2019 11:29, Brandon Butterworth wrote:
>> On Tue Dec 03, 2019 at 11:17:04AM +0200, ivaylo wrote:
>>> The idea is very good ! As all google services are fully dual stack
>>> already and running perfectly on IPV6, I dont think will be technical
>>> unimposible.
>>>
>>> The only problem is how can we make google do this?
>>
>> It's been suggested to them many times at over the years
>> (probably started with v6 day) but it's failed to get attention.
>>
>> May be we've never run into the right people to tell, other than
>> telling any googler you meet maybe it needs to find a way higher up.
>> Publicity, social?
>
> Similar proposal was done for the first time (I think) back in 2010 
> (by Sander and myself), but what we got back from Google repeatedly 
> over all this years (several times) was more or less excuses why they 
> can't do it...
>
> https://go6.si/2010/08/suggestion-for-internet-search-engines-proposed-ipv6-impact-on-search-engine-scoring-algorithms/ 
>
>
> Maybe if we collectively suggest it again they would look at it again. 
> I heard that they'll take "speed of loading" into account, they 
> already implemented it for http/https scoring, so I really can't see 
> why offering content over IPv6 could not improve the ranking...
>
> Cheers, Jan Žorž
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> members-discuss mailing list
> members-discuss at ripe.net
> https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss
> Unsubscribe: 
> https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/daniel%40privatesystems.net