[members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Carlos Friacas
cfriacas at fccn.pt
Thu Sep 22 23:42:38 CEST 2016
Hi, In the case someone missed it, there is already a training department :-) two IPv6 courses (https://www.ripe.net/support/training/courses), and even an IPv6 e-learning course (https://academy.ripe.net/). This is only a personal opinion, but all the content is extremely well built. :-) Regards, Carlos Friaças On Thu, 22 Sep 2016, Daniel Pearson wrote: > Tim, > > I would say you get a gold star for recommending something feasible and realistic. RIPE already had a budget excess of over 5 Mil EUR last year. I would not be > opposed if RIPE was tasked with creating a department to help with IPv6 education through programs like that. > > Daniel~ > > On 09/22/2016 11:51 AM, Tim Armstrong wrote: > > Rather than bickering over the last scraps of IPv4, saving smaller LIRs a few hundred euros, attempting to somehow screw the older LIRs, or three at the > same time. Wouldn't our time be better spent working out ways to improve end user adoption of IPv6? > > I'd like to propose RIPE set up a fund (summer of code style) for the implementation of native IPv6 support in open-source software (such as cloudsta k, > etc) and simplifying end-user adoption. Perhaps we should even offer a free public IPv6 tunnel service for natural persons similar to the service > currently offered by hurricane electric. > > -Tim > > > On 22 Sep 2016 6:13 p.m., "Floris Bos" <bos at je-eigen-domein.nl> wrote: > On 09/22/2016 01:57 PM, Daniel Pearson wrote: > I'm not saying that a discussion is bad, but I'm simply saying that most of the discussions are being had are not based on fact. > > To my knowledge RIPE doesn't have a list of members categorized by assignment size, so this is something that someone would need > to parse the RIPE db for, it's all public record so it can be done. > > > Counting all allocated IPv4 each LIR has, and converting it back to CIDR: > > CIDR Number of LIRs > > <= /24 1 > <= /23 4 > <= /22 6051 > <= /21 1582 > <= /20 1638 > <= /19 1547 > <= /18 1040 > <= /17 709 > <= /16 386 > <= /15 293 > <= /14 134 > <= /13 110 > <= /12 80 > <= /11 64 > <= /10 25 > <= /9 14 > <= /8 6 > <= /7 2 > > IPv6 only 241 > > > If we were to take ARIN's fees as example where up to and including /20 is less expensive than RIPE's current fees, 9276 out of the 13686 > LIRs with IPv4 would pay less. > Not just new ones... > > Total income would be similar. > > > Yours sincerely, > > Floris Bos > > > ---- > If you don't want to receive emails from the RIPE NCC members-discuss > mailing list, please log in to your LIR Portal account and go to the general page: > https://lirportal.ripe.net/general/ > > Click on "Edit my LIR details", under "Subscribed Mailing Lists". From here, you can add or remove addresses. > > > > ---- > If you don't want to receive emails from the RIPE NCC members-discuss > mailing list, please log in to your LIR Portal account and go to the general page: > https://lirportal.ripe.net/general/ > > Click on "Edit my LIR details", under "Subscribed Mailing Lists". From here, you can add or remove addresses. > > > >
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]