[members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tim Armstrong
t.armstrong at nerdalize.com
Wed Sep 14 12:38:36 CEST 2016
Fearghas explicitly identified: > How does an IX that operates at Layer 2 drive the price of IPv4 up ? While I've never seen a Layer2 only IX (presumably just an unmanaged switch in a colo DC?). The specific question is quite succinct. Presumably Fearchas operates, participates in, or knows of such an IX. -Tim On 14/09/16 12:27, Silvan M. Gebhardt wrote: > yes but the IX assigns the Peering IP's in their subnet Allocation ;) > > so it would be "Price v4 and v6 peering ip's differently" > > ----- Ursprüngliche Mail ----- > Von: "Tim Armstrong" <t.armstrong at nerdalize.com> > An: members-discuss at ripe.net > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 14. September 2016 12:17:23 > Betreff: Re: [members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model > > You do understand Layer2 is MAC right? IP is in Layer3. > > > On 14/09/16 12:07, Paul Webb wrote: >> Sell IPv6 ports and IPv4 ports ? >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: members-discuss [mailto:members-discuss-bounces at ripe.net] On Behalf Of Fearghas Mckay >> Sent: 14 September 2016 11:02 >> To: members-discuss at ripe.net >> Subject: Re: [members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model >> >> Paul >> >>> On 14 Sep 2016, at 10:40, Paul Webb <Paul.Webb at clearstreamgroup.co.uk> wrote: >>> >>> Certainly RIPE, but organisations such as the IX's, could also start making IPv4 more expensive and help the migration and I'd argue they should be. Sadly the larger LIR's have a disproportionate influence in all the important places, which doesn't help. >> How does an IX that operates at Layer 2 drive the price of IPv4 up ? >> >> Chris >> >>> If you look at the UK for example, I can't think of any large LIR/ISP that is fully IPv6 ready (there's only one I can think of that isn't too far off), yet I can think of many smaller ones that are 100% good to go and have been for some time. >> Apart from BT and Sky that have both just finished the v6 rollouts. >> >> f >> >> >> ---- >> If you don't want to receive emails from the RIPE NCC members-discuss mailing list, please log in to your LIR Portal account and go to the general page: >> https://lirportal.ripe.net/general/ >> >> Click on "Edit my LIR details", under "Subscribed Mailing Lists". From here, you can add or remove addresses. >> >> ---- >> If you don't want to receive emails from the RIPE NCC members-discuss >> mailing list, please log in to your LIR Portal account and go to the general page: >> https://lirportal.ripe.net/general/ >> >> Click on "Edit my LIR details", under "Subscribed Mailing Lists". From here, you can add or remove addresses. > > ---- > If you don't want to receive emails from the RIPE NCC members-discuss > mailing list, please log in to your LIR Portal account and go to the general page: > https://lirportal.ripe.net/general/ > > Click on "Edit my LIR details", under "Subscribed Mailing Lists". From here, you can add or remove addresses. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20160914/359d8d76/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]