[members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2016

Hi,

On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 02:44:56PM +0000, Sascha Luck [ml] wrote:
> I wouldn't bet on the outcome either - I can think of a few LIRs
> who'd want the PI charge to be zero too, let alone ASN charges...

Well, I can see that if someone made shortsighted contracts with their
customers ("you get this PI and AS for free, for ever!"), they might
object.

Otherwise, I cannot see why a LIR would object to "fees for the independent
objects get billed to the customer anyway, and as a consequence, the LIR
fee itself goes *down*"...

(Now, for the vast number of LIRs it won't make a difference - their own
AS number would cost money then, but the LIR fee would get adjusted, so the 
net sum would be about the same - only for LIRs with lots of independent 
resources it makes a significant difference.  Which might explain as well 
why most LIRs are not overly interested in this discussion either)

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 811 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20150328/8d401e9a/attachment.sig>