[members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2016
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2016
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2016
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Luck [ml]
ripe-md at c4inet.net
Sat Mar 28 15:44:56 CET 2015
On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 01:55:45PM +0100, Gert Doering wrote: >I am fairly sure I said it back then as well: the way new charging >schemes are usually presented ("take this or leave it") does not actually >help - if people overall agree with the changes, like "it will get cheaper >for me!", but still disagree with the policy implications, what are they >supposed to vote for? I'm not sure it would be possible to vote on CC items separately - I guess it would have to be different options (eg if ASN charge of nEUR then membership fee is xEUR, etc) to make the CC match the Budget in all cases. I wouldn't bet on the outcome either - I can think of a few LIRs who'd want the PI charge to be zero too, let alone ASN charges... rgds, Sascha Luck
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2016
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2016
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]