KPNQwest ns.eu.net server.
Robert Depenbrock rod at energis-ision.de
Thu Jun 6 16:43:13 CEST 2002
On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 04:07:09PM +0200, Nipper, Arnold wrote: > As a lot of people are offering secondary services: may be it's a good idea > to place infrastructural services at IXP. IXP seem to be more stable than > any ISPs and often more neutral than ISPs. > > Comments? > Good Idea ! A natural choice seems to be a safe place at a IX that is operated and owned by an independend Company or Organisation, so that Chapter 11 candidates not interfer with the service. In my opinion is the placement of root namkeserver at some IX a good and safe choice for the future. regards Robert Depenbrock -- Energis-ISION Robert Depenbrock SE Technical Consulting Harburger Schlossstr. 1 Hamburg - Germany robert.depenbrock at energis-ision.com http://www.energis-ision.com/ Tel.: +49-40-77175-263
[ lir-wg Archives ]