[ipv6-wg] Report from ITU Study Group 20 meeting 3-13 December 2018 in Wuxi, China
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Report from ITU Study Group 20 meeting 3-13 December 2018 in Wuxi, China
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Report from ITU Study Group 20 meeting 3-13 December 2018 in Wuxi, China
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nick Hilliard
nick at foobar.org
Fri Dec 14 12:41:19 CET 2018
Jim Reid wrote on 14/12/2018 10:58: >> On 14 Dec 2018, at 07:23, de Brün, Markus >> <markus.debruen at bsi.bund.de> wrote: >> >> As I understood, there will be a new version of the draft. > > That depends on the original author. He has not updated > Y.IPv6RefModel, the ITU draft document, for two years and so far has > not taken account of *any* of the feedback from the WG. I will be > very surprised if that situation changes. Addressing the comments > from the WG would pretty much mean throwing away the current draft > and starting all over again from scratch. More to the point, the work on Y.IPv6RefModel should stop because the subject matter is out of scope for the ITU. Nick
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Report from ITU Study Group 20 meeting 3-13 December 2018 in Wuxi, China
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Report from ITU Study Group 20 meeting 3-13 December 2018 in Wuxi, China
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]