[ipv6-wg] Report from ITU Study Group 20 meeting 3-13 December 2018 in Wuxi, China
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Report from ITU Study Group 20 meeting 3-13 December 2018 in Wuxi, China
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Report from ITU Study Group 20 meeting 3-13 December 2018 in Wuxi, China
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jim Reid
jim at rfc1035.com
Fri Dec 14 12:06:39 CET 2018
> On 14 Dec 2018, at 10:58, Jim Reid <jim at rfc1035.com> wrote: > > SG20 did not accept the proposals from RIPE NCC, ARIN and the US government -- backed by UK, Germany and Canada -- that work on Y.IPv6RefModel should stop. But they came very close to doing that. It was a meta-discussion on proceduals matters that detailed things, not the content of the "kill Y.IPv6RefModel" proposals. Ugh! That last sentence should have been: > It was a meta-discussion on procedural matters that derailed things, not the content of the "kill Y.IPv6RefModel" proposals. I'm sure you all realised that anyway.
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Report from ITU Study Group 20 meeting 3-13 December 2018 in Wuxi, China
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Report from ITU Study Group 20 meeting 3-13 December 2018 in Wuxi, China
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]