[ipv6-wg] IPv6 prefix delegation BCOP document available for comments and suggestions

On 04/11/2017 11:57 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Apr 2017, Yannis Nikolopoulos wrote:
>
>> 3.2.2: /48 for all is most practical & most pragmatic? How many /32 we
>> need to burn for our end users? We have ~1.6M residential users and
>> our /29 is definitely not enough. Is RIPE onboard with that?
>
> Yes. /48 per site is ok as per all IETF and RIPE documents I am aware of.
>
> So if your /29 is too small for your customer base, go get another one.
> I know ISPs who returned their /29 before they even started serious
> deployment, and received larger space. I encourage people to do just this.
>

That's great to hear but when we upgraded our /32 to a /29 (~2011), this 
was not the case unfortunately (meaning that RIPE would not accept our 
long term addressing plan as a reason enough to get multiple /29s