[ipv6-wg] IPv6 prefix delegation BCOP document available for comments and suggestions
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 prefix delegation BCOP document available for comments and suggestions
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 prefix delegation BCOP document available for comments and suggestions
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mikael Abrahamsson
swmike at swm.pp.se
Tue Apr 11 10:57:24 CEST 2017
On Tue, 11 Apr 2017, Yannis Nikolopoulos wrote: > 3.2.2: /48 for all is most practical & most pragmatic? How many /32 we need > to burn for our end users? We have ~1.6M residential users and our /29 is > definitely not enough. Is RIPE onboard with that? Yes. /48 per site is ok as per all IETF and RIPE documents I am aware of. So if your /29 is too small for your customer base, go get another one. I know ISPs who returned their /29 before they even started serious deployment, and received larger space. I encourage people to do just this. -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike at swm.pp.se
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 prefix delegation BCOP document available for comments and suggestions
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 prefix delegation BCOP document available for comments and suggestions
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]