[ipv6-wg] v4 versus v6 -- who connects faster?
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] v4 versus v6 -- who connects faster?
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] v4 versus v6 -- who connects faster?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jen Linkova
furry13 at gmail.com
Mon May 23 14:37:46 CEST 2016
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 2:29 PM, Jen Linkova <furry13 at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 2:15 PM, Nico CARTRON <nicolas at ncartron.org> wrote: >>> [a] http://goo.gl/hbzbwD > >> Out of curiosity, I tried accessing it from the NAT64 Wifi network at >> RIPE72, >> and http://dragon.eecs.jacobs-university.de:5000 seems not to work for some >> reason. >> Thoughts? > > furry at Wintermute:~>dig dragon.eecs.jacobs-university.de aaaa +short > 2001:638:709:3000::3a > furry at Wintermute:~>telnet -6 dragon.eecs.jacobs-university.de 5000 > Trying 2001:638:709:3000::3a... > telnet: connect to address 2001:638:709:3000::3a: Connection refused > telnet: Unable to connect to remote host > > That host does have IPv6 address in DNS (so no NAT64 is involved) but > nothing is listening on tcp/5000 on that IPv6 address. ...or there is a firewall on the path blocking connections and sending RST back... -- SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] v4 versus v6 -- who connects faster?
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] v4 versus v6 -- who connects faster?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]