[ipv6-wg] v4 versus v6 -- who connects faster?
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] v4 versus v6 -- who connects faster?
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] v4 versus v6 -- who connects faster?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jen Linkova
furry13 at gmail.com
Mon May 23 14:29:34 CEST 2016
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 2:15 PM, Nico CARTRON <nicolas at ncartron.org> wrote: >> [a] http://goo.gl/hbzbwD > Out of curiosity, I tried accessing it from the NAT64 Wifi network at > RIPE72, > and http://dragon.eecs.jacobs-university.de:5000 seems not to work for some > reason. > Thoughts? furry at Wintermute:~>dig dragon.eecs.jacobs-university.de aaaa +short 2001:638:709:3000::3a furry at Wintermute:~>telnet -6 dragon.eecs.jacobs-university.de 5000 Trying 2001:638:709:3000::3a... telnet: connect to address 2001:638:709:3000::3a: Connection refused telnet: Unable to connect to remote host That host does have IPv6 address in DNS (so no NAT64 is involved) but nothing is listening on tcp/5000 on that IPv6 address. -- SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] v4 versus v6 -- who connects faster?
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] v4 versus v6 -- who connects faster?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]