[ipv6-wg] Maximum acceptable IPv6 prefix in BGP table?
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Maximum acceptable IPv6 prefix in BGP table?
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Maximum acceptable IPv6 prefix in BGP table?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Antonio Prado
thinkofit at gmail.com
Wed Jun 15 11:54:23 CEST 2016
On 6/14/16 6:23 PM, Paul Hoogsteder wrote: > If you filter all of IPv4 at /24 then you can't reach certain > destinations, so don't do that... currently I don't filter out prefixes >24bit, but if I ever needed to I could live with that. I would suddenly forget about 807 disaggregated IPv4 routes and 2 IPv6: according to my pov == IPv4 == /25: 54 /26: 51 /27: 147 /28: 208 /29: 347 SUM: 807 ========== == IPv6 == /64: 2 ========== -- antonio
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Maximum acceptable IPv6 prefix in BGP table?
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Maximum acceptable IPv6 prefix in BGP table?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]