[ipv6-wg] Interest in IPv6-only world?

please guide through IPv6 only on Wi-Fi dedicated (PTP and PTMP) and
Hotspot. This area is ripe for IPv6 only network requiring less complexity.


IMTIAZ AHMED
(Chief Executive Officer)

*TEDS (Private) Limited*
*
*273-B, St.55, F-11/4, Islamabad-44000.
T: +92 512 211 700 ,  M: +92 334 516 76 09 E: ceo at teds.pk <info at teds.pk>




On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 6:10 PM, Jason Fesler <jfesler at gigo.com> wrote:

> FYI, there is a wiki being used to track how things behave in the
> IPv6-only (and the NAT64) world; specifically focused on the case of
> hosts without *any* IPv4 at all.
>
> you're welcome to browse, and contribute. :-)   Contribution does
> require a (moderated) login; but it's open to anyone who doesn't act
> like a spambot.
>
> http://wiki.test-ipv6.com/
>
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 4:46 AM, Dan Luedtke <maildanrl at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I am running an IPv6-only network, but to be honest it is not yet
> > ready to to handle all my use cases. Often operating system updates
> > fail due to ipv4-only update servers. The equipment is all software,
> > the switch is openvswitch on a 12-NIC linux box from soekris, the
> > router is a linux box and most of the systems are linux systems. Thus
> > I am able to implement everything what I am missing in software. I do
> > not have to wait for vendors to implement a specific feature. The
> > downside of this is, that it quite slow. It works for small work
> > groups, but it would never scale up to enterprise environment.
> >
> > Dual Stack networks and NAT64 networks cost more money, so I see a
> > real business case for IPv6-only as soon as there are no bigger
> > business cases bound to ipv4 (like hundreds(!) of enterprise
> > applications that were in the stoneage of IT)
> >
> > Best regards
> >
> > Dan
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 4:53 PM, Shane Kerr <shane at time-travellers.org>
> wrote:
> >> All,
> >>
> >> I saw this today:
> >>
> >> http://wiki.test-ipv6.com/wiki/Main_Page
> >>
> >> And I was thinking about the seeming increase in interest recently in
> >> researching the realities of an IPv6-only world.
> >>
> >> According to Cisco's IPv6 stats site:
> >>
> >> http://6lab.cisco.com/stats/
> >>
> >> We're a long way from having most content available over IPv6... but
> >> not *that* long, if we can take the 40% numbers seriously.
> >>
> >> So I guess this is mostly a "setting the groundwork" for now, but maybe
> >> not. Does anyone actually run an IPv6-only network now, or is thinking
> >> about it? (As in, without a gateway to the IPv4 world.)
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >>
> >> --
> >> Shane
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Dan Luedtke
> > http://www.danrl.de
> >
>
>
>
> --
>  Jason Fesler, email/jabber <jfesler at gigo.com> resume: http://jfesler.com
>  "Give a man fire, and he'll be warm for a day;
>  set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/ipv6-wg/attachments/20130808/507b21f1/attachment.html>