[ipv6-wg] Interest in IPv6-only world?
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Interest in IPv6-only world?
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Interest in IPv6-only world?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jason Fesler
jfesler at gigo.com
Wed Aug 7 03:10:33 CEST 2013
FYI, there is a wiki being used to track how things behave in the IPv6-only (and the NAT64) world; specifically focused on the case of hosts without *any* IPv4 at all. you're welcome to browse, and contribute. :-) Contribution does require a (moderated) login; but it's open to anyone who doesn't act like a spambot. http://wiki.test-ipv6.com/ On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 4:46 AM, Dan Luedtke <maildanrl at gmail.com> wrote: > I am running an IPv6-only network, but to be honest it is not yet > ready to to handle all my use cases. Often operating system updates > fail due to ipv4-only update servers. The equipment is all software, > the switch is openvswitch on a 12-NIC linux box from soekris, the > router is a linux box and most of the systems are linux systems. Thus > I am able to implement everything what I am missing in software. I do > not have to wait for vendors to implement a specific feature. The > downside of this is, that it quite slow. It works for small work > groups, but it would never scale up to enterprise environment. > > Dual Stack networks and NAT64 networks cost more money, so I see a > real business case for IPv6-only as soon as there are no bigger > business cases bound to ipv4 (like hundreds(!) of enterprise > applications that were in the stoneage of IT) > > Best regards > > Dan > > On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 4:53 PM, Shane Kerr <shane at time-travellers.org> wrote: >> All, >> >> I saw this today: >> >> http://wiki.test-ipv6.com/wiki/Main_Page >> >> And I was thinking about the seeming increase in interest recently in >> researching the realities of an IPv6-only world. >> >> According to Cisco's IPv6 stats site: >> >> http://6lab.cisco.com/stats/ >> >> We're a long way from having most content available over IPv6... but >> not *that* long, if we can take the 40% numbers seriously. >> >> So I guess this is mostly a "setting the groundwork" for now, but maybe >> not. Does anyone actually run an IPv6-only network now, or is thinking >> about it? (As in, without a gateway to the IPv4 world.) >> >> Cheers, >> >> -- >> Shane >> > > > > -- > Dan Luedtke > http://www.danrl.de > -- Jason Fesler, email/jabber <jfesler at gigo.com> resume: http://jfesler.com "Give a man fire, and he'll be warm for a day; set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Interest in IPv6-only world?
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Interest in IPv6-only world?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]