[ipv6-wg] [routing-wg] MERIT Darknet Experiment and RPKI alerts
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] [routing-wg] MERIT Darknet Experiment and RPKI alerts
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] [routing-wg] MERIT Darknet Experiment and RPKI alerts
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Shane Kerr
shane at time-travellers.org
Tue Nov 13 11:59:12 CET 2012
Daniel, On Tuesday, 2012-11-13 09:36:39 +0100, Daniel Karrenberg <daniel.karrenberg at ripe.net> wrote: > > On 09.11.2012, at 12:05 , Wilfried Woeber wrote: > > > Overall, I think this is very dangerous approach, and the wrong way > > to start with. > > > > There might be very good reasons, why a full block of (IPv6) > > addresses, or a subset of, ist not (yet) globally visible. > > Announcing/Hijacking those addresses may seriously interfere with > > local tests or pilot deployment. > > > > IMHO this should be strictly opt-in, instead of opt-out! > > > > Wilfried. > > Wilfried, you are right. The agreement I thought we made with Merit > was to use unallocated address space. Apparently a misunderstanding > occurred somewhere along the way. We will talk to Merit and correct > this. Possibly such experiments should be announced in advance in the future, so that everyone can know what is going on. Ideally a pointer to a web page with full details about the experiment, but at least just a quick mail to the routing working group (and the IPv6 working group in cases where appropriate) seems reasonable. If this is something that requires a policy change I'd be happy to push it forward. Cheers, -- Shane
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] [routing-wg] MERIT Darknet Experiment and RPKI alerts
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] [routing-wg] MERIT Darknet Experiment and RPKI alerts
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]