[ipv6-wg] [routing-wg] MERIT Darknet Experiment and RPKI alerts
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] [routing-wg] MERIT Darknet Experiment and RPKI alerts
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] [routing-wg] MERIT Darknet Experiment and RPKI alerts
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Daniel Karrenberg
daniel.karrenberg at ripe.net
Tue Nov 13 09:36:39 CET 2012
On 09.11.2012, at 12:05 , Wilfried Woeber wrote: > Overall, I think this is very dangerous approach, and the wrong way to start with. > > There might be very good reasons, why a full block of (IPv6) addresses, or a > subset of, ist not (yet) globally visible. Announcing/Hijacking those addresses > may seriously interfere with local tests or pilot deployment. > > IMHO this should be strictly opt-in, instead of opt-out! > > Wilfried. Wilfried, you are right. The agreement I thought we made with Merit was to use unallocated address space. Apparently a misunderstanding occurred somewhere along the way. We will talk to Merit and correct this. Daniel
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] [routing-wg] MERIT Darknet Experiment and RPKI alerts
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] [routing-wg] MERIT Darknet Experiment and RPKI alerts
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]