[ipv6-wg] Last call on the replacement of ripe-501 "Requirements for IPv6 in ICT equipment"

On 10/21/11 10:32 AM, Ivan Pepelnjak wrote:
> Also keep in mind that RIPE-501(bis) addresses a very specific need:
> helping IT managers select the best real-life IPv6-capable
> equipment.

Hi,

Indeed. That's the intention :)

>
> We could put together the best list of RFCs and drafts, but if nobody
> supports them (and thus an IT manager using RIPE-501bis cannot buy
> the boxes he needs), we've just shot ourselves in the foot ... unless
> you word the document in a way that says RFC-xxxx is mandatory, but
> RFC-yyyy is highly recommended as its replacement and brings you
> bonus points.

I think it is that way (as we already had this discussion in the 
past)... Well established RFC is mandatory, "upgrade" optional - so I 
like to think :)

/jan